Can 'Invisibility Cloaks' Protect Buildings From Earthquakes?

By - 335 words

Language

Reading Level

Listen to Article

Scientists have been intrigued with the concept of making objects and even events disappear ever since J.K. Rowling planted the seed with Harry Potter's invisibility cloak. They have had limited success in both so far, by manipulating light waves - bending them to make objects invisible, and making events disappear by changing their speed. Now, some mathematicians are proposing the same principle to protect buildings from earthquake damage.

The bold idea is the brainchild of a team of researchers led by Dr. William Parnell from the University of Manchester. Their proposal, which so far is largely theoretical, is based on changing the course elastic or seismic waves, similar to what scientists have done with light waves.

The researchers believe that if large buildings in earthquake-prone regions are padded with pressurized rubber at their bases, it could keep specific types of elastic waves from traveling through the ground, which in theory would result in the waves traveling around the building, rather than through it.

While it may sound like science fiction, the idea behind it is not too far-fetched, because of the way seismic waves travel through the ground. While there is no stopping them when they are rippling through dense rock and soil, the waves get deflected when they encounter any pressurized object and end up going around them instead of through them, similar to how light waves behave through a prism or water.

So, if we placed a giant rubber padding filled with air or some pressurized fluid around the foundation of any structure, it should in theory, be able to deflect the seismic waves, making the building invisible and therefore, invincible, when faced with even the largest shakers!

While it would be impractical to cloak every building with rubber, it would certainly help to protect important ones like nuclear power plants, thus averting the recent Japan-like crises. Though scientists have a long way to go before this becomes a reality, the fact that it is even a possibility, is quite exciting.

Resources: gizmag.com, allshookup.org, Discovery.com, cnet.com

Cite Article
Learn Keywords in this Article
244 Comments
  • tiernan7681
    tiernan7681over 11 years
    i never knew about this it is so amazing just a really really really wow!!!!!!!!!
    • Elyasover 11 years
      i thought invisible things were not real
      • ruaryover 11 years
        cool
        • singsong
          singsongover 11 years
          I never knew that there were such thing as invisibility cloaks! They are soooo cool!
          • chanelly2323
            chanelly2323over 11 years
            i knooow right! i think they should start doing invisible cloaks that spread over the world! imagine having no rain
          • rasberryover 11 years
            I can`t belive there is an cloak which is actually invisible !!!!!!! ( awesome )
            • chanelly2323
              chanelly2323over 11 years
              i know rasberry, i didnt actually realize that this was tue too! and J.K Rowling got them thinking about it, how cool is that?
            • paradisemomo
              paradisemomoover 11 years
              no no no plz no earthquakes
              • aniseover 11 years
                scary
                • Piehammer almost 12 years
                  Wow I would not like to be in that mess
                  • Micaabout 12 years
                    I sure feel sad for the people that were on that building
                    • maffrapiggy
                      maffrapiggyover 12 years
                      That idea is really cool. I hope the scientists suceed in this project. Making a building invisable would be amazing! How did scientists even get those ideas. A gaint rubberband filled with air around a building can stop a earthquake? Stopping a earthquake could really help this world in the future. My only question is that how could you get out of the buildings after the rubberband is put around it?